Most of the time he was just an insulting POV poster. Now that he is in
trouble he's striking out more.
Fred
From: David Gerard <fun(a)thingy.apana.org.au>
Reply-To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 21:34:13 +0000
To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] three revert rule and quickpolls
On 05/06/04 19:49, Fred Bauder wrote:
From: David Gerard
<fun(a)thingy.apana.org.au>
> On 05/06/04 13:40, KNOTT, T wrote:
>> The general consensus appears to be the
quickpolls do not appear to work in
>> the case of violations of the three revert rule. Fair enough. So what do we
>> do now? I would like admins to have the power to 24hour block someone who
>> violates this rule, once they have received a warning. I personally can't
>> see
>> any situation where someone would have a legitimate reason to revert more
>> than three times in a day.
>> Vandalism - protect the page.
>> Um what else? I can't think of anything. What does everyone else think?
> That's a sweet thought, but 24.45.99.191
has been going hogwild
> with (a) spamming large slabs of text across the place (b) altering
> archives of talk pages yesterday and today. I put it on the
> Vandalism page, but it doesn't seem to warrant any action. Just
> what does it take for an anon IP vandal to get blocked?
This is Paul Vogel who is a hairbreath short of a
1 year ban. He has only
hours, perhaps minutes to go. See [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Paul
Vogel]].
Yes, I know it is. So you're saying it takes four months for an anon IP
vandal to get blocked?
- d.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l