Deliberate disruption of WP by rampant deletionists seems to be tollerated for now. I guess it will have to cause even more damage before anything is done. Mark
--- "csherlock@ljh.com.au" csherlock@ljh.com.au wrote:
Ya, I know. But if it's officially sanctioned that GNAA can go onto VfD as many times as people want, then that's not disruption, right? So then a precedent is set.
Snowspinner wrote:
[[Wikipedia:Don't disrupt Wikipedia to prove a
point]]
-Snowspinner
On Dec 25, 2004, at 7:26 PM, csherlock@ljh.com.au wrote:
Guys, how many times are we going to list this
before we stop this
abuse of process? This is now the fifth time the
article has been on
votes for deletion and that sucks.
It seems to me that the deletionists won't stop
till it's gone. I
would like to propose that after this vote, we
never allow it to be
listed every again.
If we don't, then I'm considering putting
[[Childlove movement]] back
on VfD until I can gather enough support. Clearly
if we're allowed to
place GNAA on VfD unlimited times then it will be
fine to put
Childlove movement on there till we get rid of
it.
Ta bu shi da yu
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? All your favorites on one personal page � Try My Yahoo! http://my.yahoo.com