Deliberate disruption of WP by rampant deletionists
seems to be tollerated for now. I guess it will have
to cause even more damage before anything is done.
--- "csherlock(a)ljh.com.au" <csherlock(a)ljh.com.au>
Ya, I know. But if it's officially sanctioned
GNAA can go onto VfD
as many times as people want, then that's not
disruption, right? So then
a precedent is set.
[[Wikipedia:Don't disrupt Wikipedia to prove
On Dec 25, 2004, at 7:26 PM,
> Guys, how many times are we going to list this
before we stop this
> abuse of process? This is now the fifth time
article has been on
> votes for deletion and that sucks.
> It seems to me that the deletionists won't stop
till it's gone. I
> would like to propose that after this vote,
never allow it to be
> listed every again.
> If we don't, then I'm considering putting
[[Childlove movement]] back
> on VfD until I can gather enough support.
if we're allowed to
> place GNAA on VfD unlimited times then it
fine to put
> Childlove movement on there till we get rid
> Ta bu shi da yu
> WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l mailing list
Do you Yahoo!?
All your favorites on one personal page � Try My Yahoo!