csherlock@ljh.com.au said:
Snowspinner wrote:
[[Wikipedia:Don't disrupt Wikipedia to prove a point]]
Ya, I know. But if it's officially sanctioned that GNAA can go onto VfD as many times as people want, then that's not disruption, right? So then a precedent is set.
You have to take into account intent. I nominated GNAA for the fifth time. I nominated what appeared to me to be a clear candidate for deletion. Had I known its full history I would not have done so. If a more experienced editor had done so, I think you'd have a good point about disruption to make a point. With me, the intent to disrupt was not there.