The Cunctator wrote:
Boy, it's sure easy for people to attack her, when her criticism of the articles as poorly muddling medical with moral issues is entirely valid.
If the criticism was directed at the one article, then no problem, but she's going from there to a blanket condemnation of the entire encyclopedia and the people working hard on it. It's insulting to dedicated contributors to suggest that their content is worthless without an anointed editorial board to bless it, and it betrays massive ignorance and an unwillingness to learn. Given that, I'd recommend extra leeriness and doublechecking of all of her assertions - she sounds to me more like a faux expert trying to snow us with haughty attitude and big words. Beware!
Stan