The Cunctator wrote:
Boy, it's sure easy for people to attack her, when her criticism of the
articles as poorly muddling medical with moral issues is entirely valid.
If the criticism was directed at the one article, then no problem, but she's
going from there to a blanket condemnation of the entire encyclopedia
and the
people working hard on it. It's insulting to dedicated contributors to
suggest that their content is worthless without an anointed editorial board
to bless it, and it betrays massive ignorance and an unwillingness to learn.
Given that, I'd recommend extra leeriness and doublechecking of all of her
assertions - she sounds to me more like a faux expert trying to snow us
with haughty attitude and big words. Beware!
Stan