Anthere wrote:
Well. Other perfectly well integrated editors have
done similar things. Ie, considering the point of view
of editors who had made a very small number of
contributions had less weight than them. Imho, that
makes sense. Also, he did not try to "cheat" and make
the change with noone being aware of it, since he put
a comment.
I think were more and more things be decided by votes
(how sad), there is perhaps need to check whether
there is no double voting.
If we end up in a situation where votes make a difference, we shouldn't
put ourselves in a position where double voting will have any
significant effect. That's better than trying to devise schemes for
frustrating the cheaters.
Where votes are taken they can only give us temporary solutions. New
people who join after the vote should have the opportunity to have their
influence mean something even if it means reversing a policy..
Ec