Anthere wrote:
Well. Other perfectly well integrated editors have done similar things. Ie, considering the point of view of editors who had made a very small number of contributions had less weight than them. Imho, that makes sense. Also, he did not try to "cheat" and make the change with noone being aware of it, since he put a comment.
I think were more and more things be decided by votes (how sad), there is perhaps need to check whether there is no double voting.
If we end up in a situation where votes make a difference, we shouldn't put ourselves in a position where double voting will have any significant effect. That's better than trying to devise schemes for frustrating the cheaters.
Where votes are taken they can only give us temporary solutions. New people who join after the vote should have the opportunity to have their influence mean something even if it means reversing a policy..
Ec