I'm also of the opinion that this whole problem seems pretty easily solved
by just using the PID numbers. If the only folk who will, in practice,
make use of this functionality are template developers, it seems to me that
they should be able to look up the PID numbers. I like the idea of using
substitution to do the initial lookup for them.
While I think that being able to reference properties by name in Wikitext
would be nice, I'm not convinced its currently worth it.
Thank you,
Derric Atzrott
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 2:43 AM, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hoi,
The drawbacks are that you make assumptions about languages. Also having
localised names prevents the copying of functionality from one to the
other. So I would not use it, I would show a localised name and its
desctription but store the property identifier. Text in this is a service
not to be relied upon.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 12 July 2015 at 00:35, Daniel Kinzler <daniel.kinzler(a)wikimedia.de>
wrote:
Am 11.07.2015 um 23:21 schrieb Gerard Meijssen:
Hoi,
If none of this is visible to users, the whole point of names of
properties are
senseless. Why have them in the first place and
prevent this whole
issue by
using the property identifier itself.
So, being able to use a localized name to refer to a property in wikitext
is not
useful?
--
Daniel Kinzler
Senior Software Developer
Wikimedia Deutschland
Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata