Am 08.07.2015 um 13:43 schrieb John Erling Blad:
We will get clashes between different ontologies,
can't see how we can
avoid that. Our label should be unique, but not aliases. We use
aliases as a way to access something that we later must disambiguate.
We should not have a uniqueness constraint on aliases, it simply makes
no sense.
That's what we had. The problem is: you can't change the label without changing
all references to it, then. IF properites can also be addressed by their
aliases, it's simple to change the primary name (label), or add a secondary name
(alias).
What kind of clash with another ontology do you mean? Can you give a concrete
example?
--
Daniel Kinzler
Senior Software Developer
Wikimedia Deutschland
Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.