Rather than FRBR (which isn't that great, even for books), I'd look at how
MusicBrainz and/or Freebase do things (they're pretty closely aligned, I
think).
Composition
https://www.freebase.com/m/048bf9
Single
https://www.freebase.com/m/01hmyv3
Sticky Fingers album
https://www.freebase.com/m/01hmy3x
primary album release
https://www.freebase.com/m/03436qv
Brown Sugar track on that release
https://www.freebase.com/m/0l44n1g
Brown Sugar recording which appears as that track on the album
https://www.freebase.com/m/0frvqbn
Each of these, except for the release-recording connector, is linked back
to the corresponding entity on MusicBrainz, so you can see how they present
the same information.
The advantage of following a schema like MusicBrainz is that you get to
take advantage of the knowledge of domain experts who've thought deeply
about how to structure this information. This is something like the third
major revision of their schema, over many years, so a *lot* of thought has
gone into it.
The advantage of the Freebase view is that it shows how the music specific
piece integrates with other general knowledge elements and external
information sources like Discogs <http://www.discogs.com/release/1489020>
in a manner similar to what Wikidata would want to do.
https://www.freebase.com/music/album?schema=
https://www.freebase.com/music/release?schema=
https://www.freebase.com/music/recording?schema=
https://www.freebase.com/music/recording?schema=
https://www.freebase.com/music/artist?schema=
https://www.freebase.com/music/composition?schema=
https://musicbrainz.org/doc/MusicBrainz_Database/Schema
Tom
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemowiki(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
At BEIC, to test the Wikidata ontology and the
feasibility of
collaborations on music data, I was assigned a seemingly simple test: add
in Wikidata all the data contained in
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_Sugar_(The_Rolling_Stones_song) .
Turns out things are not so simple:
* the Wikipedia articles, from an FRBR (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FRBR
) perspective, often mix multiple levels or even all of them (song,
recording, album, single, edition of the single) which on Wikidata need to
be separate items, but the split is not obvious:
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Q21887964 ;
* I was unable to properly add information on per-country hit list
position.
Please give a look to the items I linked, to my
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Music updates and to
the open questions I added in
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata_talk:WikiProject_Music .
In particular, I think librarians will be interested in this proposal for
a "performance of" property, which (like the existing "edition of"
property) could benefit from being framed in a FRBR perspective by someone
more versed in FRBR.
https://www.wikidata.org/?diff=287456096
Nemo-BEIC
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata