On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Maarten Dammers <maarten(a)mdammers.nl>
wrote:
Hi Tom,
Op 29-12-2015 om 19:33 schreef Tom Morris:
Thanks Stas & Thomas. That's
unambiguous. :-) (And thanks to
Jdforrester who went through and fixed all my examples)
Please keep the long label around as an alias. This really helps when you
enter data.
The guidelines say to move the disambiguation information to the
description (which makes sense since that's the only information the
autocomplete widget shows). Speaking of aliases, I got a chuckle out of the
species alias discussion - "The label of Helianthus annuus (Q171497)
<https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q171497> is the common name, while the
scientific name (*Helianthus annuus*) is featured as an alias"
I wonder if someone ever ran a bot to clean up these
disambiguations. The
US alone must be thousands of items.
From my observations, it appears that most, but not
all, of the
parenthetical disambiguation information was removed on import from
wikipedia, but little or no comma separated disambiguation was removed. If
P131 "located in the administrative territorial entity" was set correctly,
it would be relatively straightforward for a bot to identify information to
be removed, but, unfortunately, the bot that set all these, at least
locally, (AudeBot) used an administrative entity two levels higher than it
should have, making the property value useless. Fixing P131 first would
make it easier to identify disambiguation information to be removed from
labels.
Tom