My suggestion was to start with new iw links on Wikidata, which is Not a random selection, but represent the last created on any versions, which more represent the most asked for
Anders
Federico Leva (Nemo) skrev 2014-06-24 08:34:
Anders Wennersten, 24/06/2014 08:06:
below 500 ch
I assume you know of https://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesArticlesGt500Bytes.htm
In the meanwhile I'll repeat myself ad nauseam: any approach based on random selection of articles is useless for quality assessment, because it's not representative of what people actually read on the wiki.
Nemo
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l