Thinking about it, drawing lots might not be the silliest idea in the universe.
After all, ability to write a great application is at best a rough proxy for actual impact. Why not have a less granular system that filters out the "clear No"s and then allocate the remaining places by ballot, taking into account the demographics/projects that need to be represented?
Chris
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 4:19 PM, DerHexer derhexer@wikipedia.de wrote:
That's true: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Wikimania_scholars/Reviewer%27s_guide... (that this is not the perfect system is well known to everyone in the committee which, as Mardetanha said, changes every year—it's still very hard to implement a process which does not favor these who are used to write good applications if we don't draw lots).
We had to start the scholarship processes at some point due to visa regulations, unfortunately before the program team could finish their process. For that reason, the scholarship committee proposed to save some money for people who could not hold their presentations without a scholarship. But in the end, it's the WMF who thankfully manages all the outcomes and the jury only evalutes the applications at some point.
Best, Martin/DerHexer
Von: Sjoerd de Bruin sjoerddebruin@me.com An: Wikimania general list (open subscription) wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org Gesendet: 17:15 Freitag, 1.Juni 2018 Betreff: Re: [Wikimania-l] Wikimania-l Digest, Vol 146, Issue 1
I think that is already included in scholarship applications, if I remember correctly.
Greetings,
Sjoerd de Bruin
Op 1 jun. 2018, om 17:06 heeft Julie Workman mlle.julie.w@gmail.com het volgende geschreven:
Is there at present any metric by which previous scholarship attendees are judged on their dissemination of Wikimania experiences after the conference? The complaint being brought up is not only about awardees getting repeat scholarships, but failing to enrich their communities afterwards with what they learned / what it was like / who they met / what they will do now. With a limited number of scholarships available, it is true that the attendees are expected to share their good fortune with those who couldn't attend.
If nothing like that is in place, could it not be added? For example, a field on the application: "were you awarded a scholarship last year (and attended)?" "If yes, please describe (and provide links where possible) to the activities and discussions you organised with your community regarding your experience at Wikimania". If a sufficiently good and detailed response is not provided, the application can receive a lower score (or possibly be discarded...? I'm not au fait with the process).
Julia W
On 1 June 2018 at 13:00, wikimania-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
Send Wikimania-l mailing list submissions to wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia. org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/ mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to wikimania-l-request@lists. wikimedia.org
You can reach the person managing the list at wikimania-l-owner@lists. wikimedia.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Wikimania-l digest..."
Today's Topics:
- Re: Update on Wikimania '18 (Pine W)
- Re: Update on Wikimania '18 (cs)
Message: 1 Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 18:31:08 -0700 From: Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com To: "Wikimania general list (open subscription)" <wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia. org> Subject: Re: [Wikimania-l] Update on Wikimania '18 Message-ID: <CAF= dyJinVGV5eM7vBi7SFDLcqyLP4yakD a=VckDJZ4rPN76K1A@mail.gmail. com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Harry, I recall hearing that there was a push a year or two back to alter the proportion of presentations at Wikimania so that there were fewer WMF presentations and more community presentations. I don't know if that was a one time event or if that's ongoing. I have never been to Wikimania, and have no plans to go in the foreseeable future, but I watch what happens with Wikimania partly because it's an expensive operation in terms of financial cost and in terms of volunteer time. Also, the scholarship system is a perennial point of friction.
Dariusz or Ellie, are there any thoughts at WMF about doing a full review of the scholarship system and the value of Wikimania to the community? With WMF spending so much money on Wikimania year after year, and volunteers spending so much time on Wikimania year after year, I think that it would make sense to do this type of review, which might be possible to synchronize with WMF's strategy process. I am very interested in ensuring that there are SMART goals being achieved with all of the money and time that goes into Wikimania. At the same time, I think that the scholarship system could be reviewed to consider the strategic priorities for scholarships and how to align those priorities to SMART goals. I don't envision reducing funding for Wikimania and scholarships, but I think that some re-thinking and evaluation would be good to align funding with the WMF strategic plan and with SMART goals.
Pine ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/User:Pine )
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 12:31 PM, Harry Mitchell hjmwiki@gmail.com wrote:
Since you raise chapter scholarships, it would be nice to see some of the other big chapters (and to some extent the WMF) spending more on scholarships for rank-and-file Wikimedians rather than staff and board members. That might help with the perception that Wikimania is the same old faces year in, year out.
Harry Mitchell http://enwp.org/User:HJ +44 (0) 7507 536 971 Skype: harry_j_mitchell