While i don't know much about the specific circumstances, i agree in general that there are many more ways to make the most of Wikimania and to contribute than through speaking. One on one meetings and networking will rarely show up on a programme but are very valuable for affiliates. Especially when you hope to learn from and collaborate with other affiliates.
Lodewijk
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018, 13:21 Frans Grijzenhout frans@wikimedia.nl wrote:
Hi Bodhisattewa, Please take into consideration that Rahul did more than speaking for a few minutes during the chairs' meeting in Cape Town.
- He prepared a discussion note for this meeting about a sensitive topic.
- Rahul and me had several discussions (per skype and in person) in the
weeks preceding the actual meeting.
- Rahul presented his ideas during the meeting and was actively engaged in
the discussion.
- And in the end he got some home work as well: enhancing his note with
the outcomes of the discussion. The contribution of Rahul was much appreciated. Regards, Frans
*Frans Grijzenhout*, voorzitter / chair
+31 6 5333 9499
*Vereniging Wikimedia Nederland* Mariaplaats 3 - 3511 LH Utrecht Kamer van Koophandel 17189036 http://www.wikimedia.nl/
2018-07-30 15:51 GMT+02:00 Subhashish Panigrahi psubhashish@gmail.com:
Though I’m not sure if it’d be right to take names here, but this is probably an opportunity to discuss about:
- if there is a need for consensus when a Wikimedia affiliate provides
support to one person from another affiliate
- if an affiliate provides support if they share it on wiki for
transparency or not
- Wikimania scholarship recipients generally create Learning Patterns and
write reports. These are good practices in general but making it mandatory for the scholarship recipients brings out a really valuable pool of knowledge which otherwise might not be the case because of the post-Wikimania fatigue. There is a need for more clarity if non-Wikimania participants (individual/affiliate reps) who travel because of support from another affiliate should also produce the same
- If an affiliate decides to provide support, should they announce
publicly (on regional mailman lists and meta/village pumps) if there is any conflict. If there was a rationale that the former used to identify certain individuals, should they share that as well?
I think discussing these above would be useful in general.
Bodhi, didn’t want to steal your thunder but I think some of the general points (above) can be discussed which in someway would be useful for all such future supports.
Subhashish
Begin forwarded message:
*From:* Bodhisattwa Mandal bodhisattwa.rgkmc@gmail.com *Date:* July 27, 2018 at 12:32:20 PM GMT+5:30 *To:* wikimediaindia-l wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org *Subject:* *[Wikimediaindia-l] Wikimania tour of Rahul Desmukh* *Reply-To:* Wikimedia India Community list < wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
Hi,
WMIN chapter president Rahul Deshmukh attended Wikimania 2018 in Cape Town without being selected for any type of scholarship. My question is why was he sent to the conference depriving other community members from India who were in the waiting list.
He spoke in the informal chairpersons' meetup for few minutes. The meeting doesn't require president of the organization's presence, and already there were 2 EC member of WMIN present, who could have attended the meeting.
To me, this is utter misuse of power and abuse of donation money.
Thanks, Bodhisattwa
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
Wikimania-l mailing list Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
Wikimania-l mailing list Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l