On 8 Jul 2007 at 19:42:27 +0100, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
No, the reason can be that it engages in harassment and outing, and is therefore dangerous to know. Honest reporting? Don't give me that.
Declaring any information to be "dangerous to know" is a bizarre attitude for anybody involved in creating an encyclopedia to have. Are we not to have information on explosives, weapons, murder, suicide, poison, sex, drugs, ... [insert favorite hot button topic here] either?