On 8 Jul 2007 at 12:26:37 +0100, Guy Chapman aka JzG
<guy.chapman(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
No, it is not a "better source". It is a
thread contributed to by a
group of banned trolls, vanity spammers and other malcontents, all
bearing substantial chips on their shoulders and harbouring enormous
grudges. I fail to see under what circumstances it could be
considered a reliable source. Let Brandt lay out his line of
reasoning on his own website, without the additional bile and
hatefulness.
But it does happen to be where the actions that led to a notable
event got kicked off... you can't rewrite history to eliminate the
role of a site involved in the event just because you dislike it.
And is it your position that all other sites and forums need to
"honor" Wikipedia bans by not allowing anybody you have designated as
a "troll" to speak?
--
== Dan ==
Dan's Mail Format Site:
http://mailformat.dan.info/
Dan's Web Tips:
http://webtips.dan.info/
Dan's Domain Site:
http://domains.dan.info/