--- David Vizcarra david.vizcarra@gmail.com wrote:

However, his concept of "outside opinions" was those who he usually sides with and he knows agree with

him.

This may be true. But it sounds like an opinion about a user. What does this have to do with anything?

the[[User:SlimVirginjayjgJpgordon]] would never have existed.

Some vandal making a page is supposed to prove something? You've lost any foundation in reason here.

That is perhaps the reason for so much vandalism on his user page and talk page. Many people have been angered by allgeged pro-Jewish bias.

Back to the bottom rung, David. This train of thought is one that even very reasonable people can rightly call "over the top," and perhaps even "bigoted." Youre asserting that because a user has been the target of allegations that such allegations are true and justified, and that therefore they are tied to your claim of their ethnic or religious bias. ATM his bias appears far less in need of correcting than is your apparent excessive theorizing on the nature of his ethno-religious particulars, and your accusation of such bias. Do you see the difference?

While I sympathise with you feeling that youve been ganged up on in an article dispute, at a certain point you appear to stop being rational, and your choice of attacking a person for his group status has little distinction from attacking a group itself. Your approach has literally no hope of success or drawing support for your views, and reasonable people may consider it inexcusable behaviour, until you see to correct it.

SV

__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com