Doesnt seem so sticky. I rewrote the sentence.
Apparently Mark was sticky on using the term
"pseudoscience" - practically a pejorative, or at
least a colored characterization.
Granted, no real scientist considers creation science
to be science or any part of it. But any NPOV use of
the term pseudoscience requires an explanation which
may not be warranted in a one-sentence overview.
SV
--- Daniel Mayer <maveric149(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
--- Mark Pellegrini <mapellegrini(a)comcast.net>
wrote:
As you can imagine, it's very much a
back-and-forth thing. Look at the
versions from earlier in the week following edits
by pro-creationist
users FuelWagon, Rossnixon and especially
PWhittle
(as well as the IP
address 138.130.203.177
Sounds like another sticky issue like the climate
change problem. Good thing
the ArbCom has already seen this type of case
before.
-- mav
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the
tour:
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs