2009/4/28 <WJhonson(a)aol.com>om>:
In a message dated 4/27/2009 4:27:02 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com writes:
That's the point we are disputing, you can't use it as a premise for
your argument...>>
----------------------
I know you are disputing it. I'm stating that it's a given.
It underlies our policy that we only consider reliable sources.
Sources which are not reliable sources, do not count as anything, anywhere
in the project.
They don't count to determine notability, they don't count to determine
extent of coverage, they simply don't count.
That's my opinion of what our policy states.
No-one is disputing what the policy page says. We can all read. The
dispute is over what policy *should* be. Stating what policy *is* is
not at all helpful.