In a message dated 4/28/2009 12:30:47 AM Pacific Daylight Time, doc.wikipedia@ntlworld.com writes:
And all that information will probably be [[WP:OR]], since I doubt that the media bothered doing a "Jimbo's pants: where are they now" follow-up a few months later. ;)>>
------------------------------------- It's only OR if you personally interview Rachel or Jimmy. If you re-report what Rachel states on her own site, it's not OR.
Will
**************An Excellent Credit Score is 750. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1221621499x1201450105/aol?redir=http... ilExcScore428NO62)
WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 4/28/2009 12:30:47 AM Pacific Daylight Time, doc.wikipedia@ntlworld.com writes:
And all that information will probably be [[WP:OR]], since I doubt that the media bothered doing a "Jimbo's pants: where are they now" follow-up a few months later. ;)>>
It's only OR if you personally interview Rachel or Jimmy. If you re-report what Rachel states on her own site, it's not OR.
Will
Actually, I'd say this thread isn't so much OR as TROLL.
I'm hardly Jimmy's biggest fan, but this smacks of "hey we haven't discussed Jimbo's sexlife for a bit, have we?"
Is there a substantive point to this? Otherwise, perhaps take any content issue to [[talk:Jimbo Wales]] and any other issue to somewhere like "Wikipedia Review" (although even there many will find it somewhat off-topic)
Scott
WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 4/28/2009 12:30:47 AM Pacific Daylight Time, doc.wikipedia@ntlworld.com writes:
And all that information will probably be [[WP:OR]], since I doubt that the media bothered doing a "Jimbo's pants: where are they now" follow-up a few months later. ;)>>
It's only OR if you personally interview Rachel or Jimmy. If you re-report what Rachel states on her own site, it's not OR.
But then, is it [[WP:RS]]? ;-)
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:05 AM, Kwan Ting Chan ktc@ktchan.info wrote:
WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 4/28/2009 12:30:47 AM Pacific Daylight Time, doc.wikipedia@ntlworld.com writes:
And all that information will probably be [[WP:OR]], since I doubt that the media bothered doing a "Jimbo's pants: where are they now" follow-up a few months later. ;)>>
It's only OR if you personally interview Rachel or Jimmy. If you re-report what Rachel states on her own site, it's not OR.
But then, is it [[WP:RS]]? ;-)
While dependent sources can't establish notability, they can generally be used to augment bits. It's probably ethically important that we allow someone who disputes published facts, but can't get their own story published to have "their side" included if they self-publish, and note the situation as such, for instance.
Brian