This may apply from time to time to certain of our editors.
Fred
http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/10/endortest.shtm
For Release: 10/05/2009 FTC Publishes Final Guides Governing Endorsements, Testimonials Changes Affect Testimonial Advertisements, Bloggers, Celebrity Endorsements
The Federal Trade Commission today announced that it has approved final revisions to the guidance it gives to advertisers on how to keep their endorsement and testimonial ads in line with the FTC Act.
The notice incorporates several changes to the FTCs Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising, which address endorsements by consumers, experts, organizations, and celebrities, as well as the disclosure of important connections between advertisers and endorsers. The Guides were last updated in 1980.
Under the revised Guides, advertisements that feature a consumer and convey his or her experience with a product or service as typical when that is not the case will be required to clearly disclose the results that consumers can generally expect. In contrast to the 1980 version of the Guides which allowed advertisers to describe unusual results in a testimonial as long as they included a disclaimer such as results not typical the revised Guides no longer contain this safe harbor.
The revised Guides also add new examples to illustrate the long standing principle that material connections (sometimes payments or free products) between advertisers and endorsers connections that consumers would not expect must be disclosed. These examples address what constitutes an endorsement when the message is conveyed by bloggers or other word-of-mouth marketers. The revised Guides specify that while decisions will be reached on a case-by-case basis, the post of a blogger who receives cash or in-kind payment to review a product is considered an endorsement. Thus, bloggers who make an endorsement must disclose the material connections they share with the seller of the product or service. Likewise, if a company refers in an advertisement to the findings of a research organization that conducted research sponsored by the company, the advertisement must disclose the connection between the advertiser and the research organization. And a paid endorsement like any other advertisement is deceptive if it makes false or misleading claims.
Celebrity endorsers also are addressed in the revised Guides. While the 1980 Guides did not explicitly state that endorsers as well as advertisers could be liable under the FTC Act for statements they make in an endorsement, the revised Guides reflect Commission case law and clearly state that both advertisers and endorsers may be liable for false or unsubstantiated claims made in an endorsement or for failure to disclose material connections between the advertiser and endorsers. The revised Guides also make it clear that celebrities have a duty to disclose their relationships with advertisers when making endorsements outside the context of traditional ads, such as on talk shows or in social media.
The Guides are administrative interpretations of the law intended to help advertisers comply with the Federal Trade Commission Act; they are not binding law themselves. In any law enforcement action challenging the allegedly deceptive use of testimonials or endorsements, the Commission would have the burden of proving that the challenged conduct violates the FTC Act.
The Commission vote approving issuance of the Federal Register notice detailing the changes was 4-0. The notice will be published in the Federal Register shortly, and is available now on the FTCs Web site as a link to this press release. Copies also are available from the FTCs Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20580.
The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTCs online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 1,700 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTCs Web site provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.
2009/10/8 Fred Bauder fredbaud@fairpoint.net:
This may apply from time to time to certain of our editors. http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/10/endortest.shtm
Yes. It actually came up in a discussion of a particular company who are known to employ astroturfers via their PR company.
The catch will be whether the recommendation has any teeth, i.e. if the FTC shows any practical signs of caring in the slightest. We'll see.
- d.
The report on National Public Radio the other day stated it was unlikely the FTC would be very aggressive about this. Yet the piece's principal focus was bloggers. It'd be an interesting question how they'd handle the matter when it bleeds over to Wikipedia.
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:32 PM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/8 Fred Bauder fredbaud@fairpoint.net:
This may apply from time to time to certain of our editors. http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/10/endortest.shtm
Yes. It actually came up in a discussion of a particular company who are known to employ astroturfers via their PR company.
The catch will be whether the recommendation has any teeth, i.e. if the FTC shows any practical signs of caring in the slightest. We'll see.
- d.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
2009/10/9 Durova nadezhda.durova@gmail.com:
The report on National Public Radio the other day stated it was unlikely the FTC would be very aggressive about this. Yet the piece's principal focus was bloggers. It'd be an interesting question how they'd handle the matter when it bleeds over to Wikipedia.
About two seconds after the dedicated POV warriors add it to their alleged COI arsenal.
- d.
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:03 AM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/9 Durova nadezhda.durova@gmail.com:
The report on National Public Radio the other day stated it was unlikely the FTC would be very aggressive about this. Yet the piece's principal focus was bloggers. It'd be an interesting question how they'd handle the matter when it bleeds over to Wikipedia.
About two seconds after the dedicated POV warriors add it to their alleged COI arsenal.
"Oops, was that a legal threat?" *block*
This should be reasonably self-correcting.