On Dec 4, 2007, at 9:03 AM, David Gerard wrote:
On 04/12/2007, Daniel R. Tobias
<dan(a)tobias.name> wrote:
A few years ago, a critic of the Singapore
government wrote an
article alleging that the government tried to suppress its critics by
bringing frivolous legal action against them. The government
responded by suing the critic for libeling the government.
Hopefully, the leadership of Wikipedia and of this list can show more
sense than this, but I'm not always particularly confident of it.
No no no. I think it's more like Hitler.
Does Godwinning a discussion still work when Godwin is the WMF lawyer?
-Phil