On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 06:46:11 -0500, "Alec Conroy" alecmconroy@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/4/07, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/12/2007, Dan Rosenthal swatjester@gmail.com wrote:
Private Musings wrote:
two journalists have contacted me to date concerning these events, and personally, whilst it may blow over, I
Funny, looks like you wrote the Slashdot.org article about it. http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/04/0333252
I've booted this troll from the list as counterproductive for working on the encylopedia. I'm sure he can have lots of fun on WR.
Eeek. I always wish we could make things just a little bit clearer that we're not, say, blocking, banning, or booting people just for saying bad things about us.
A few years ago, a critic of the Singapore government wrote an article alleging that the government tried to suppress its critics by bringing frivolous legal action against them. The government responded by suing the critic for libeling the government.
Hopefully, the leadership of Wikipedia and of this list can show more sense than this, but I'm not always particularly confident of it.
On 04/12/2007, Daniel R. Tobias dan@tobias.name wrote:
A few years ago, a critic of the Singapore government wrote an article alleging that the government tried to suppress its critics by bringing frivolous legal action against them. The government responded by suing the critic for libeling the government. Hopefully, the leadership of Wikipedia and of this list can show more sense than this, but I'm not always particularly confident of it.
No no no. I think it's more like Hitler.
- d.
On Dec 4, 2007, at 9:03 AM, David Gerard wrote:
On 04/12/2007, Daniel R. Tobias dan@tobias.name wrote:
A few years ago, a critic of the Singapore government wrote an article alleging that the government tried to suppress its critics by bringing frivolous legal action against them. The government responded by suing the critic for libeling the government. Hopefully, the leadership of Wikipedia and of this list can show more sense than this, but I'm not always particularly confident of it.
No no no. I think it's more like Hitler.
Does Godwinning a discussion still work when Godwin is the WMF lawyer?
-Phil