There has been enough discussion over the months, and enough deletion. I
hope we can fix a couple of things at least. This is not perfect for
everyone, but I hope we can agree on this path.
Anthere
Ray Saintonge a écrit:
Phil Sandifer wrote:
But recipes, well, there's an awful lot of
them. And I can just
imagine the NPOV fights on them. (Chile with or without beans?
Chocolate chip cookies with nuts? White or dark meat chicken? Does a
dash of cumin improve the dish?) And they're not something that most
people would think to go to an encyclopedia about.
This argument is pure speculation. Can you give examples of where it in
fact has happened? Any recipe can easily accomodate notes about hoe it
can be varied.
Not every good thing should go into the
Wikipedia. If it tries to do
everything, it only serves to obsure the things it genuinely does well
with. The fact that wikibooks is not as successful as the English
encyclopedia does not negate it. It means that more work needs to be
done. Should we kill the foreign language encyclopedias for their
failure to do as well as the English one too, and just have all the
foreign language articles in one main encyclopedia?
Wikipedia is better known because it's easier to see an elephant than a
mouse. Nobody is arguing in favour of doing everything, so that's
another irrelevant argument.
Yes, our recipe coverage on wikibooks is not
great. Perhaps if the
people fighting over whether we should move them to the encyclopedia
were to go and add some recipes, though, it would do better.
The fight is not over whether recipes should be moved TO the
encyclopedia, but whether they should be moved FROM it. In the event
that the move was made it also was about whether a redirect should be
retained.
Ec