<<In a message dated 1/14/2009 7:58:26 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, arromdee@rahul.net writes:

You didn't answer the question about who gets to see them.

Given most possible answers to this question, it'll just end up being the same as AFD. After all, right now an admin can see a deleted article.

Well, is it about hiding articles ready for public consumption, or isn't it? If it is, stubs get hidden. If it's not, you shouldn't say it is.>> --------------------------------- You may not know much about me. I am at-times viciously anti-admin :) Power corrupts and admins can get corrupted as easily as the next petty bureaucrat I would never, not ever, not one single time ever, advocate a new power for admins. I would advocate removing 80% of the special admins powers which already exist.

Now that I've had my soapbox, no, I'm saying these articles can be read in-project, but not out-project.

Stubs are not necessarily not-ready-for-viewing. They are just stubby and we'd like to expand them. This proposal only discusses those articles that would go up for AfD. Not even the most outrageous editor tags every stub, so neither would we. Some might get tagged however. Like I said it's two different issues.

Will Johnson

**************Inauguration '09: Get complete coverage from the nation's capital.(http://www.aol.com?ncid=emlcntaolcom00000027)