In a message dated 2/24/2008 3:15:59 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, dgerard@gmail.com writes:
Lots of people being loudly wrong doesn't mean Betacommand or his bot are doing anything wrong, oddly enough. Noise is not evidence.>>
------------- The evidence is there. The established editors voicing issues, are not "loudly wrong". They just don't agree with BCB's particular interpretation of how things should be.
The system works based on consensus and co-operation. This page illustrates problems which should be discussed and resolved, not ignored.
Will Johnson
**************Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living. (http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duf... 2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598)
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 3:21 PM, WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
The evidence is there. The established editors voicing issues, are not "loudly wrong". They just don't agree with BCB's particular interpretation of how things should be.
The system works based on consensus and co-operation. This page illustrates problems which should be discussed and resolved, not ignored.
The specific statements you have made here, in this thread, were simply factually wrong.
A bunch of people upset does not mean that there is, in fact, a policy violation going on.
That this whole thing is perpetually badly communicated is a failure in how Betacommand and others are operating, but that doesn't mean that the bot is breaking policy.