On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 3:46 PM, <WJhonson(a)aol.com> wrote:
In a message dated 2/24/2008 3:42:33 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
That this whole thing is perpetually badly communicated is a failure in
Betacommand and others are operating, but that doesn't mean that the bot
You can follow policy while simultaneously upsetting 5 or 50 established
That is not a rationale for what BCB did.
Not that I agree that BCB is actually following policy. BCB has, and
continues to refuse any transparency into his process. So we really can't
It should be fairly plain that many established editors have issues with
situation. So merely stating that he is or isn't following policy
quite get at the core issue.
There is complete transparency in what Betacommandbot is doing.
It's taking fair-use licensed images, which don't have a currently policy
compliant fair-use justification including a per-page justification for
where it's used now, and tagging them as policy noncompliant.
Is there any part of that which is unclear to you?
-george william herbert