Sorry, I didn't mean your answer, but Jossi reposting his/her post of this morning just now.
On 14/04/07, Andries Krugers Dagneaux andrieskd@chello.nl wrote:
This is what I meant to post. I re-posted some material to keep the context intact. I may have made a mistake.
On 4/14/07, jf_wikipedia jf_wikipedia@mac.com wrote:
Are editors "licensing their edits to WP and retaining copyright"?
Yes. However, edits that modify text already in existence are derived works and if they incorporate parts of someone else's text, Andries cannot relicense.
-Matt
I will remove the few and minor contributions of others and not just re-write in Citizendium what others wrote in Wikipedia.
I am still hoping that somebody can take over editing the Wikipedia entry [[Sathya Baba movement]] after I was topic-banned in the [[arbcom case Sathya Sai Baba2]]. Please have a look at [[Sathya Baba movement]] and see if you can improve it. Nevertheless, I am afraid that the entry in Wikipedia will probably remain in its unfinished state because the arbcom banned the only serious contributor during its three years of existence.
[[user:Andries]] Andries Krugers Dagneaux
-----Original Message----- From: Gary Kirk [mailto:gary.kirk@gmail.com] Sent: zaterdag 14 april 2007 20:11 To: andrieskd@chello.nl; English Wikipedia Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Citizendium's assertions about material from Wikipedia
This was reposted why?
-- Gary Kirk