so is it fair to assume that latex math equations rendered as images do not have a image description page? Is there any list of image types or some way to verify or know which kind of images will not have image description page? I also saw a couple of graphs associated with imagemap didnt have image description pages. for ex: the chart on the page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corbola I noticed all the images for which I wasnt able to find image description pages had names which looked like some sort of hash....basically names consisting of 32 characters using numbers 0-9 and alphabets a-z with extension png. Am I correctly identifying the images without image description pages this way? Thanks Priyank On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Richard Farmbrough <richard(a)farmbrough.co.uk> wrote:

i was thinking on the same lines before, and right now my code mimics the behavior you mentioned. However, today i came across this corbola timeline, which made me tweak my code again. So if there was a better way to know which images to disregard, i could do a better structuring of my code. Thanks for such fast responses. really appreciate the comments. :) Priyank On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Andrew Gray <andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk> wrote: