--- Daniel Ehrenberg <name12323(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
Sounds good, but only a sysop could change that
status of the page. Or
maybe there could be a cookie identifier on each
person's computer so we
could track them? The cookie would be blockable.
Hello list,
For Tannnin
I don't like very much the idea of adding another
class level on Wikipedia. I think it is a slow
constitution of a very rigid hierarchy, where more and
more people forget being a sysop imply more duties
than rights. And it would make very obvious that
non-loggued in people are not trusted.
For Daniel
What do you mean by a trackable cookie ? Another
spying intention on people ? Invasion privacy ?
Tracking exactly what ?
Yours
Athypique
Maybe it is
worth considering having a special
class of Wikipedia
article that is not a completely protected page,
but can only be edited
by logged-in contributors. I'm not sure if
this
would work or not, or
if it would be practical to implement. I'm
just
thinking aloud. Any
>bright ideas out there? Comments?
>
>
>Tony Wilson
>(Tannin)
>list(a)redhill.net.au
___________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français !
Yahoo! Mail :
http://fr.mail.yahoo.com