--- Daniel Ehrenberg <name12323(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
Should user pages should be protected for that
username only? It would make
sense, because that's who it's intended for. But
maybe not because then
someone could post any libelous or offensive content
they wanted. Maybe
sysops and the user should be able to edit the users
page. What do you
think? Would it destroy the Wiki concept or help
free speech and protection
of the page? Is it worth changing or thinking about?
Hello list
Maybe the username page could be protected against any
edition done by any other user except the logued in
user. If the logued in user is abusing us in posting
insanity, discussion with him would be enough to drive
him out of the idea. Just like some users were asked
by the community to change their user name because it
did not please the community. The choice of a user
name and of a user page content is free as long as
community is happy with it. Similarly, regular sysop
have no possibility now to change a user name; why
would they have the right to change the content of the
page ? The user name and the user page are his image.
Yours
Athypique
___________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français !
Yahoo! Mail :
http://fr.mail.yahoo.com