In a message dated 10/28/2008 4:56:39 PM Pacific Daylight Time, scs@eskimo.com writes:

But remember: the *real* burden of proof/disproof is on the editor who actually makes a change, not on the new, untested editor who might have been merely the first person to point out that the change was necessary.>> -------------------- Exactly how I would have handled it. Add a {{fact}} tag. If I have the sources to look-up then I will, if I don't, I or we presume that some other interested editor *will* and will do so, and fix the suspect clause within a certain amount of time.

You can view the *backlog* of fact tag's to see that there is a great amount of work yet to do. I find some that are over a year old. Typically if I were an interested editor, I'd only let it live for a week before removing the clause.

But again, this case is two years old. I.E. it was settled long ago.

**************Play online games for FREE at Games.com! All of your favorites, no registration required and great graphics – check it out! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1211202682x1200689022/aol?redir= http://www.games.com?ncid=emlcntusgame00000001)