In a message dated 10/28/2008 4:56:39 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
scs(a)eskimo.com writes:
But remember: the *real* burden of proof/disproof is on the
editor who actually makes a change, not on the new, untested
editor who might have been merely the first person to point out
that the change was necessary.>>
--------------------
Exactly how I would have handled it. Add a {{fact}} tag. If I have the
sources to look-up then I will, if I don't, I or we presume that some other
interested editor *will* and will do so, and fix the suspect clause within a
certain amount of time.
You can view the *backlog* of fact tag's to see that there is a great amount
of work yet to do. I find some that are over a year old. Typically if I
were an interested editor, I'd only let it live for a week before removing the
clause.
But again, this case is two years old. I.E. it was settled long ago.
**************Play online games for FREE at
Games.com! All of your favorites,
no registration required and great graphics – check it out!
(
http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1211202682x1200689022/aol?redir=
http://www.games.com?ncid=emlcntusgame00000001)