Peter Mackay wrote:
If you don't want to get involved, and I can
appreciate that you have
better
things to do than be continually stamping out
stupid little fires, why
not
get (say) half a dozen editors you trust to have
sensible heads on their
shoulders, point them in the direction of the stupid little problem and
ask
them to keep an eye on it. Pick a different
half-dozen each time. Think
of
it as an unofficial jury duty. Solid, steady,
experienced editors are
going
to do the right thing, quench the flames, monitor
the situation and if
things get out of hand, they will call for assistance from their own
resources. In effect, they put the thing on their watchlists.
That's pretty much what I'm asking for ;-) Preferably people less
inclined than me to call a spade a fucking shovel.
- d.
:) Is blatant disregard for established policy also included in stupidity?
Mgm