Ken Arromdee wrote
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Thatcher131 Wikipedia wrote:
There is nothing dishonorable in the Committee admitting that they're stuck, and remanding the situation for further discussion. Since the case ended up focusing on policy rather than individual behavior (i.e. edit warring citing various policies), there is probably no other solution that doesn't actually attempt to make policy.
If so, then they should say "Remember when we made policy last time? We're cancelling that".
Oh, there is a standard disclaimer. And then there would be Keynes on changing your mind when the facts change. The AC doesn't bind itself.
Bring on the elections, I say.
Charles
----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam