http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:David_Gerard/Process_is_Dangerous
This is barely a skeleton as yet. Ideas and examples welcomed.
- d.
On 10/09/06, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:David_Gerard/Process_is_Dangerous This is barely a skeleton as yet. Ideas and examples welcomed.
With useful adds from Ummit and a pile of stuff from Phil Sandifer, this is looking much more essay-shaped. Further additions, suggestions, comments and (especially) strong disagreement is welcomed.
- d.
Excellent, I was planning on writing a Process is Good...rant/essay.
For a reason on why process is BAD, however...See [[Taylorism]] and
http://www.dollarsandsense.org/archives/2003/0903scharf.html
Perhaps a [[scripted talk]] is a article candidate?
-jtp Electrawn
On 9/10/06, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:David_Gerard/Process_is_Dangerous
This is barely a skeleton as yet. Ideas and examples welcomed.
- d.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
ig
On 10/09/06, Jason Potkanski electrawn@electrawn.com wrote:
Excellent, I was planning on writing a Process is Good...rant/essay.
Last year was the big year of "process will destroy Wikipedia" versus "ignoring the rules will destroy Wikipedia", and that's when the essays linked at the top were written.
For a reason on why process is BAD, however...See [[Taylorism]] and http://www.dollarsandsense.org/archives/2003/0903scharf.html Perhaps a [[scripted talk]] is a article candidate?
A friend of mine said "You know how Wikipedia was having a funds drive recently? they should open a shop selling spools of Wikipedia branded red tape."
- d.