If there's an image that the uploader who is in good standing says was
created by him (or his grandmother) that appears to be a homemade image and
we have no reason to think that he didn't take it, then we wouldn't delete
it.
On 9/9/06, Sean Barrett <sean(a)epoptic.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Rory Stolzenberg stated for the record:
We have to assume good faith in image uploads
unless there's a reason to
do
otherwise. If we find the image on the internet
saying it's copyrighted
with all rights reserved, then we'd delete it, or if every other of the
user's 200 images were proved to be copyvios, we'd delete it, but if we
have
no evidence, we don't delete it.
On the contrary, policy (as well as Jimbo) states an image without
provenance shall be deleted.
- --
Sean Barrett | I'm tired of getting the fuzzy
sean(a)epoptic.com | end of the lollipop. --Sugar Kane
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD4DBQFFA4ALMAt1wyd9d+URAod0AJijq+hkpwsycTIQSwWwlp4c2vVWAJ4ztF7a
pUG6q5mM3V24dHfHO8x3Yg==
=JZbA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l