Justin Cormack wrote:

I dont find the featured article process very interesting. There are lots of articles that are of that quality but I dont feel any real incentive to nominate. And quite a few of the FAs are not very good. Articles that I care about are getting better, much better and thats more important to me. What are FAs for? What percentage of articles do you expect to be FAs?

Seconded. There's lots of really good articles, but the actual FAC process is a *stupid* amount of work to *expect* anyone to go through in my direct experience. I don't see how it can scale as Raul expects it to.

(This may be an interesting side-effect of the article rating feature: seeing what articles are actually rated highly by the readers and seeing if they can get just that little bit of polish.)

- d.

- d.