Ray Saintonge wrote:
MacGyverMagic/Mgm wrote:
>AFD had a near unanimous concensus that the article
should be deleted.
>I don't have anything against merging content during the discussion, but if
>the consensus is to delete such a merge must be undone.
What vandal would do that?
Obviously, unless a merger prohibition was specifically mentioned in the
deletion request it should not apply.
Even then I don't see how it can apply. AFD is not the Editor in
Chief, deciding article content on that level. The idea of a mechanism
wherein five AFD regulars can vote that any content not ever be
included in a given article should be treated as binding is so utterly
stupid I hardly have words for it.
- d.