From: David Vizcarra david.vizcarra@gmail.com
Of course there weren't 3 edits from your part, because you and the other members of your little mafia group divided the reverts amongst yourselves.
This is the kind of statement that is more likely to provoke opposition than co-operation.
How do you know about the warning if you only gave me one? I wonder.
Your talk: page is open for everyone to view; there were at least two warnings on that page. Wonder no more.
During the warnings I was given i was in constant communication with the admin who blocked me. You suggested me to revert my revert, he asked me to revert my reverts. So I did,
Reverting your reverts means actually reverting them.
and rephrased the paragraph in a different way. Is one not able to edit at all after 3 reverts? that wasn't clear to me.
As has been explained, "rephrasing the paragraph" again and again to remove the stuff you don't like is reverting.
You and your people kept making changes to the article without prior concensus. Were disrespectful as well.
Considering that that section of the article has been stable for months before you started messing with it, against considerable opposition, I'm rather bemused that you would now complain that others were "making changes to the article without prior concensus". However, it is a moot point; the fact that you used the phrases "your little mafia group " and "you and your gang" indicates to me that further discussion is pointless.
Jay.