Hello everyone.
As a few of you may know, about 5 weeks ago some new guidelines were put into place on meta for the IRC channel #wikipedia. At the same time, the operator access list for the channel was emptied and started from scratch.
The changes were quite unpopular, to say the least. A discussion thread was started about them on the foundation-l mailing list, but probably should have been started on wikipedia-l.
Now that I am back from my holiday, I have opened a review discussion about the guidelines on their talk page on meta, which you can access at the follow URL:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:IRC_guidelines/wikipedia
I would very much appreciate the input there of all people who have an interest in the guidelines, and indeed any users of the Wikipedia-affiliated IRC channels on Freenode.
~Mark Ryan
Mark, There are Wikimedia affiliated IRC channels on Freenode. Thanks for getting even the basics wrong. Thanks, GerardM
On 7/30/07, Mark Ryan ultrablue@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone.
As a few of you may know, about 5 weeks ago some new guidelines were put into place on meta for the IRC channel #wikipedia. At the same time, the operator access list for the channel was emptied and started from scratch.
The changes were quite unpopular, to say the least. A discussion thread was started about them on the foundation-l mailing list, but probably should have been started on wikipedia-l.
Now that I am back from my holiday, I have opened a review discussion about the guidelines on their talk page on meta, which you can access at the follow URL:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:IRC_guidelines/wikipedia
I would very much appreciate the input there of all people who have an interest in the guidelines, and indeed any users of the Wikipedia-affiliated IRC channels on Freenode.
~Mark Ryan
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
On 7/31/07, GerardM gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Mark, There are Wikimedia affiliated IRC channels on Freenode. Thanks for getting even the basics wrong. Thanks, GerardM
I know this is a bit of a hot-button issue, but I'm not sure if we need this kind of tone on the mailing list...especially so early in the thread.
Johnleemk
The relative failure of the IRC guidelines should be exhibit A for those who feel that things are improved by the addition of policy and process.
IRC was not broken when this ham-handed attempt to fix it was enacted. Unsurprisingly, it is difficult to fix non-existent problems.
Best, Phil Sandifer sandifer@english.ufl.edu
You are standing in an open field west of a white house, with a boarded front door. There is a small mailbox here.
On Jul 30, 2007, at 12:35 PM, Mark Ryan wrote:
Hello everyone.
As a few of you may know, about 5 weeks ago some new guidelines were put into place on meta for the IRC channel #wikipedia. At the same time, the operator access list for the channel was emptied and started from scratch.
The changes were quite unpopular, to say the least. A discussion thread was started about them on the foundation-l mailing list, but probably should have been started on wikipedia-l.
Now that I am back from my holiday, I have opened a review discussion about the guidelines on their talk page on meta, which you can access at the follow URL:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:IRC_guidelines/wikipedia
I would very much appreciate the input there of all people who have an interest in the guidelines, and indeed any users of the Wikipedia-affiliated IRC channels on Freenode.
~Mark Ryan
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
On 7/30/07, Ron Ritzman ritzman@gmail.com wrote:
Let's compress them into 2 rules...
Don't be a dick
Use common sense
Seconded :) Also, they should just be implied rather than posted anywhere and we're golden :D
Judson [[:en:User:Cohesion]]