Anthony wrote:
On 7/29/07, Daniel R. Tobias <dan(a)tobias.name>
wrote:
On 27 Jul 2007 at 18:04:37 -0400, Anthony
<wikimail(a)inbox.org> wrote:
On 7/27/07, SPUI <drspui(a)gmail.com> wrote:
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/07/27/1943254 is currently on
the front page, along with the text "It turns out that a Wikipedia
administrator named SlimVirgin is actually Linda Mack..." Looks like
outing to me.
It's only outing if it's true, and apparently it isn't.
Then why has Slim's entire clique always been so desperate to
suppress all mention of it? This seems to have been a primary motive
of the whole idiotic "attack site link" policy, for instance.
Ironically, it's the suppression of all mention of it which is the
only reason I started paying attention to it in the first place.
Until Fred Bauder made some comment about "dem attic" I didn't know
anything about this particular "outing". Until Thomas Dalton implied
that no suppression was taking place, I figured the whole thing was
just some fringe conspiracy theory.
That's about the size of it. I couldn't be bothered with such matters
but for their repetitive re-appearance on these lists.
By the way, I found a copy of some old history dumps on
my hard drive.
Haven't gotten them loaded up yet. I'm not sure if I should share
the results beyond confirming whether or not there are in fact
oversighted versions of that article. My interest is in the coverup,
not the identity of SV (barring evidence of the "secret agent" stuff
beyond "Salinger came to believe...").
One way of dealing with the various outings of SV would be for everyone
to go to his favorite blog site to out her as well. Naturally, each
person that does this would "out" her as a different person. With
enough of these out there, who could possibly know which is the correct
identification. :-)
Ec