As Robert wants to have the final word: I wrote to the list initially in defence of Danny, and felt this was an opportune moment to unload some frustration with RK. Robert's point: "If you want to include a point-of-view, then write it" is well taken. However, someone who is aware that another POV is extant should try to include that POV to prevent an article from becoming lopsided towards one view, while "the other side" is doing its research. I agree that RFM would not have resolved the differences of opinion we have been expressing on the list. RFAr might have.

--Jfdwolff