As Robert wants to have the final word: I wrote to the list initially in
defence of Danny, and felt this was an opportune moment to unload some
frustration with RK.
Robert's point: "If you want to include a point-of-view, then write it" is
well taken. However, someone who is aware that another POV is extant should
try to include that POV to prevent an article from becoming lopsided
towards one view, while "the other side" is doing its research.
I agree that RFM would not have resolved the differences of opinion we have
been expressing on the list. RFAr might have.
--Jfdwolff