On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 05:46:47 +1000 Skyring skyring@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/15/05, James Gibbon wikipedia@jamesgibbon.com wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 10:02:16 +0100 Chris Jenkinson chris@starglade.org wrote:
Well, not that I want to start moaning about gmail, but if the way it works is not in line with existing email clients and email servers, which it does, as it ignores the in-reply-to header, I wouldn't really call it "very good". :)
Agreed, was thinking the same thing myself! "Rather poor" is probably a better description if that's the case.
It depends if you are talking about using it for viewing threads, which is what I was doing, or discussing compatibility with other browsers, which is what you two are doing!
Personally, I was talking about its compatibility with accepted standards for handling threads :D
James