On 7/15/05, James Gibbon
<wikipedia(a)jamesgibbon.com> wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 10:02:16 +0100
Chris Jenkinson <chris(a)starglade.org> wrote:
Well, not that I want to start moaning about
gmail, but if the
way it works is not in line with existing email clients and
email servers, which it does, as it ignores the in-reply-to
header, I wouldn't really call it "very good". :)
Agreed, was thinking the same thing myself! "Rather poor" is
probably a better description if that's the case.
It depends if you are talking about using it for viewing threads,
which is what I was doing, or discussing compatibility with other
browsers, which is what you two are doing!
Personally, I was talking about its compatibility with accepted
standards for handling threads :D
James
--
Dig It : a forum for European Beatles fans -