Hefty point for the writers who do not get a new article accepted
and resort to promoting their web page (no self reference) or usenet
article -- get warned and then wonder what is left to do, here (hordes, of
course, and you gotta look). Looking at it this way, "Nature" might seem out
of order, and you never can tell if someone might gravitate to tweaking
stuff out of their field. (I'm a stylist. Supposed to an
eventualist...stuborn, maybe. [Okay...one more piece of spam control, belay
concerns with Jeremy Hanson that I can not directly support, ATM, then I try
to colour that fractal that looks like a cat if I can find it --booger--
lost drive for testing music. OH! I haven't done any caffeine in ten hours.
Maybe I can clear my spam kyuu, after all.]).
Anybody welcomed somebody with suggestbot?
_______
Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do
it. --Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
From: "David Gerard" <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
2008/12/16 Thomas Dalton
<thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com>om>:
Sounds like a fantastic idea. Only problem seems
to be that they
publish the wikipedia articles/summaries before the papers, it needs
to be the other way around so the paper can be a reference for the
summary.
* '''d''', nn, v, auto, spam - ~~~~
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l