On 4/14/05, Chris Jenkinson <talrias(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Actually, we were discussing this very issue on IRC
earlier. The main
problem we found with this was that it would be a new target for
vandals - to recategorise various images into unrelated categories.
Also, when going through the filter to select categories that they do
not wish to see, people might find it objectionable to have content
like beheadings or sexual activity available for people to view. I'm
assuming of course that all 'categories' of images like this would be
on by default - also, this would only be practical if it were for
registered users, of which the vast majority of visitors aren't.
Chris (Talrias on
en.wikipedia.org)
Vanderlism is aparently not a reason not to have an image on
wikipedia. I fail to see how it can be used as a reason here. I should
be posible to set these thing by IP which should solve the schools
problem to a degree.
--
geni