Exactly, excellent parallel; although, this POV bunch is a bit bigger
and better organized. And intimidating.
Fred
On Oct 17, 2005, at 11:16 PM, Snowspinner wrote:
This is not a situation where the usual platitudes
about the Wiki
process are going to do any good. The articles are scrupulously
referenced. The problem is that the references are the paranoid
rantings of a bunch of bloggers and activist groups that no
mainstream sources considered worth refuting. It's the same problem
we had on the [[Lyndon LaRouche]] articles where we finally had to
declare that LaRouche sources were all well and good, but just
didn't count as sources for the purposes of verifiability.