Exactly, excellent parallel; although, this POV bunch is a bit bigger and better organized. And intimidating.
Fred
On Oct 17, 2005, at 11:16 PM, Snowspinner wrote:
This is not a situation where the usual platitudes about the Wiki process are going to do any good. The articles are scrupulously referenced. The problem is that the references are the paranoid rantings of a bunch of bloggers and activist groups that no mainstream sources considered worth refuting. It's the same problem we had on the [[Lyndon LaRouche]] articles where we finally had to declare that LaRouche sources were all well and good, but just didn't count as sources for the purposes of verifiability.